A failed Blitzkrieg and the worst outcome for the world

At this point it is probably safe to say that Russia’s intent to end the Ukraine fracas in a swift and quick manner has failed. Zelinsky has taken his forces to the streets and forced the Russians into brutal drawnout urban warfare.

Also, the Russians have begun attacking Urkaine energy installations.

This is probably the worst outcome for the entire world. Energy prices are expected to soar, inflation is going to be high, the Fed is forced to act.

Next week, all eyes on Jerome Powell as he testifies before congress. Will high energy prices caused by the war lead the Fed to raise 50bps in march? Will the Fed be forced to hike the global economy into a recession in 2H 2022? All I can say is that buckle up your seatbelts and be prepared.

Sanctions!

I’m not gonna elaborate more on the sanctions right now because it is pretty obvious what they are: Cut off Russian access to financial markets. But, the elephant in the room: Russian energy commodity exports, what’s going to happen to them?

Moving forward: Until Ukraine explicitly agrees not to join NATO, this fracas is set to continue.

What should we do? It is extremely difficult to trade political risk unless you have insider information, so just sit back and enjoy the show! At the end of the day, the bigger picture is hawkish fed and when inflation will begin to recede in the US. Also, when the US and EU begin to pay more attention to energy safety and securing adequate fossil fuel supply during the transition to renewables.

Why is Ukraine so important?

The headlines of the past few weeks have been reporting on the Ukraine situation day after day, and markets seem to be fixated on the events unfolding in Crimea. So why exactly is Ukraine important? And how does it affect the world economy, and normal people like us? In this post I try to give a quick breakdown on the events unfolding in Ukraine, and how it affects you and me.

There are essentially 4 important points to understand: America, Russia, Oil, and Inflation. We will go through them one by one, and then link them all up.

  1. Amercia:

In foreign affairs there is a saying ‘internal affairs determine external policies’. Of course sometimes it could be the other way around, like what is happening right now in Ukraine with a foreign power putting pressure on you, but for big countries like US and Russia, their domestic issues are largely self-determined, and not under the influence of any foreign power. The US right now is polarised between the republicans and democrats, and both parties want to win the mid term elections very badly. Therefore, as much as Biden wants to remove trade tariffs on China, he can’t because it would reflect badly on the voters and it will be bad for the democrats in mid terms. At the same time, Biden cannot be seen as being soft on Russia. In the US, politically, there are a couple of “big enemies” that any president cannot be seen as being soft against: Russia, North Korea, Iran, and recently China. As such, Biden cannot go soft on these guys. He has to adopt an aggressive foreign policy against them because that is the way to go to win voters.

2. Russia

Ever since the Crimean crisis of 2014, Russia has been under many sanctions, which has been very deterimental to their economy. This is why Russia has built very close ties to China, so that they can have a strong domestic economy by accessing the Chinese market. The russian economy, in large part relies on exports of oil and natural gas. Both are exported to China and the EU, and also the international market. Currently, Russia accounts for 17% of global natural gas output, and 12% of global oil output, a very significant amount (see BP report). So imagine if the US sanctions Russian exports of Oil and Natural Gas over what is happening now in Crimea, the oil and gas prices of 2022 are going to rise alot in the short term due to a supply shock. It will probably take some time for the price to come down as US shale oil and OPEC increase their output. What this means is that, with energy prices sky high, nobody wants to actually sanction Russia, because it will lead to high energy prices. And energy is leading the CPI component for the US right now. The same goes for natural gas in the EU. Russia knows this, that the EU and US need Russian oil and gas to be exported for energy prices to be stable. As such, it is taking this opporunity to put pressure on Ukraine in an attempt to make the US and EU compromise. But, as mentioned in part 1, the US cannot compromise due to the internal political situation. So, there is a very difficult decision here which will impact energy prices and inflation. If the US and EU let Russia get what it wants, energy prices come down, inflation comes down, but they might lose voter base. If the US and EU do not let Russia get what it wants, and impose sanctions, energy prices come up, inflation stays high, and they still might lose their voter base. It really is a game of poker. And at the end of the day, because Russia knows that the US and EU need it’s gas and oil exports to stabilise the international energy price, Russia is not afraid of being sanctioned. Either way, the US and EU are in a tough spot. And what does Russia want? Russia wants NATO to exclusively say that Ukraine will never be a part of NATO. Because if Ukraine joins NATO, then there will no longer be a buffer between NATO and Russian soil, and it will be very dire for Russian national security.

3. Oil:

High oil prices right now are due to two things: The pandemic, and the green energy movement. The pandemic is pretty much self explanatory, sudden stop in economic activity and investment, then sudden sharp rise due to huge fiscal stimulus, and energy supply unable to keep pace. The green energy movment is also causing energy companies to pause and think twice about expanding demand. Because energy projects typically span more than 10 years, building a new oil project right now might result in large carbon taxes 5 years later. And why should the energy companies be penalised 5 years later for providing the oil the world needs right now? The world wants low energy prices to keep inflation low, but at the same time wants to lower fossil fuel reliance and transition to renewables. The problem is the imbalances that this creates, resulting in the high energy prices we see today. Transition to renewables means less fossil fuels supply, but coupled with a lagging energy supply by renewables, fossil fuels prices go up. Eventually, something has to give, somebody has to compromise. Either energy companies get a carbon tax break/cut or some temporary form of immunity, OR ukraine situation has to be settled. Otherwise, high energy prices from here onwards.

4. Inflation

Energy prices have always been the big reason behind inflation in general. Expensive energy prices cause food prices to increase, cause manufacturing costs to increase, cause economic costs to increase. And if demand cannot keep up with costs, there is always the potential for an economic slowdown. In addition to this, normal folks on the ground feel the pain of inflation and tend to vote out the people in power in the hopes that a new government would be able to solve the inflation issue.

5. Short summary:

Ukraine is important because it affects so many different things at the same time: US mid term elections, Russian national security, energy prices, renewable energy transition, and inflation.

6: Market Impact:

If Russia is sanctioned: Oil prices sky rocket, inflation remains high, Fed is forced to raise rates much more aggressively. This will negatively impact equity prices in general, bearish market scenario.

If Ukraine gets resolved somewhat: Oil prices will decrease slightly, inflation will most likely drop, Fed does not have to change course, markets return back to ‘normal’, and we start to see a drop in the price of Gold.

国常会解读: Analysis of 19 Jan 22 Central Government Meeting

Link https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3650364

As usual, the main direction of the government has not changed since 2021, stabilising employment, stabilising the economy. The word of the year for 2022 is Stability 稳。

Interesting highlights from the meeting:

  1. BOSS 直聘在场

For those who don’t know, BOSS recruitment has become one of the leading platforms for recruitment in China, so it was interesting to see PM Li KeQiang invite the CEO to speak at the meeting. This also shows how concerned the government is with employment, and with understanding the employment situation from a bottom up level.

2. 更好发挥内需对经济增长的拉动作用,以政府投资撬动社会投资,推动重点建设

The government acknowledges that investment, particularly in infrastructure and property is an important part of the chinese economy. As such, 2022 will probably see more infrastructure projects. The question on my mind is, how much leverage is the central government willing to take on? In China, government debt is split into local government debt, and central governmetn debt.

3. 多措并举提升居民收入和消费能力,释放消费潜力。

I think we are going to see some pretty interesting policies to encourage consumer spending in 2022.

美国以外发达国家的困境

美,英,欧通货膨胀居高不下。如果是供应链的问题,那么货币政策是无法解决的。如果是货币政策的问题,那么供应链是无法解决的。二者叠加在一起,只能选一。归根结底,所有经济数据的来源是因为全球防疫不力。只要疫情一天在,这种经济上的两难选择依旧会存在。当美联储开始缩表时,英国欧洲会不会被迫缩表?或者承受着汇率浮动的压力继续印钞?可能接下来的一年,是美国收益最大的一年,也是全球最悲惨的一年。投资别乱来,冷静的等待。

用历史看待今天

人类历史的解释非常的多。今天我想从一个全球化工业化的角度来看看人类历史的发展。人类真正步入全球化时代的分界点是大航海时代。欧洲人通过航海发现地球不是平的,而是圆的。这些欧洲人到了非洲印度和南美洲,通过血腥的屠杀来掠夺当地的资源,成立殖民地,建立起自己帝国的经济根基。这与郑和下西洋决然不一样。

大航海时代后,发生最重要的事情就是工业革命。第一次和第二次工业革命彻底改变了西方的经济,社会和政治。由于生产力的大幅度提高,帝国主义须要更多的资源和原材料,于是他们的殖民范围扩大到了全世界。在政治层面上,以国王为代表的国家单位渐渐转变成以民主政府为代表的国家单位。即使有些国家保留了国王,可是实际权力在国会的手里。在农耕文明的时代,主要的经济矛盾来自于土地。大地主和没有自耕地的农民的矛盾。可是到了工业革命时代,大机器释放了大量的农民入城市,到工厂流水线打工。主要的矛盾是资本家和工人阶级的矛盾。这个矛盾后来发展到了冷战,也就是资本主义和社会主义的对抗。

第一次世界大战之后,大英帝国名义上还是世界最有影响力和权力的国家,可是真正崛起的是美国。因为欧洲国家大量向美国借钱,一战之后美国开始强制要求欧洲国家要还债。而欧洲国家没有选择跟美国重新谈判债务问题的条件,用全力去想办法偿还他们欠美国的钱。这直接导致德国经济崩溃,陷入高通胀。1929年股市崩盘,大萧条时代来临,埋下了二战的伏笔。

第二次世界大战之后,美国正式成为全球霸主,领导资本主义阵营与苏联领导的社会主义阵营对抗。这种对抗的本质并不是什么制度问题,而是社会主义制度对美国的出口并不利,美国公司很难进入社会主义国家做生意,所以美国就开启了冷战来瓦解这种阵营的力量,最终目的就是扩大自己的商业和资本。1950-1971年,全球金融发生了重大的变化。美国为了支持军事开支,不断的举债和印钞,影响了金本位体系。到了1971年,美国放弃金本位,布雷顿森林体系瓦解,全球进入主权货币时代。美国知道,如果想要继续扩大军事开支,打到苏联,维持其全球霸主地位,必须让全球使用美元这个主权货币。怎么让全球使用美元呢?美国与一些石油出口国家达成协议,只能够用美元来结算。这些国家出口石油赚到美元之后,美国就出口给他们先进的军事武器装备。这就是所谓的石油美元。我们可以看到一种循环。全球的美债越多,美元就越多,美国的军队就越强大,美国军队越强大,能源和大宗商品出口国就越依赖美国的军事装备,越是用美元来结算贸易。而世界其他国家只能用美元来进行贸易,剩余的美元用来买美国国债维持外汇购买力。对美国来说,这是一种良性循环。所以我们可以看到,为什么一些大宗商品出口国家都是军政府掌权?因为他们利用国家资源换取美元,美元换取军事装备,维持他们的统治地位。而这些国家的老百姓有没有真正的获益呢?国家有没有真正的发展呢?这是一个重大问题。其实美国不在乎什么主义或民主制度,只要对美国霸权地位,对美元体系有利益的,美国会支持(沙特是个民主国家吗?)。如果对美国构成威胁,对美国不利的,美国就反对和打压。

在金融层面上,1980-2008年美联储施行的是Paul Volcker 定下的抗通胀目标。一旦经济过热,通胀过高,美联储会通过提高利率来降低经济的进展速度,世界就进入经济衰退。一旦经济增速过低,美联储就会降息来刺激市场,世界就再一次的进入经济繁荣期。可是08年金融危机后,全球进入零利率负利率时代了,实际上就是MMT现代货币理论。1980-2008,美国能够不断的扩大财政赤字和举债是因为有人愿意买美国的国债。美联储需要不断的量化宽松是因为如果不这么做的话,实际的美国国债需求比当下美国国债的供应要少很多。不QE,美国的实际利率会上升,导致经济的减速,股市的崩盘。Ray Dalio 称这个是典型的 long term debt cycle dynamics, 和一个帝国衰退的开始。那么美国的衰退过程会是多长的时间呢?回顾历史来看,清朝的灭亡是从1840-1911,花了71年的时间。这段时期,清朝打过了鸦片战争,太平天国内战,甲午战争,义和团和八国联军的对抗,最终以辛亥革命为终结。大英帝国呢?打过了两次世界大战才让位给了美国。可见,我们不能够低估一个帝国的生命力和生存能力。百年建立起来的优势不会在短时间内被消耗殆尽。美国会不会因为战争而结束其霸权时代?我认为不会像英国那样的,被战争消耗。因为核武器问世以后,大规模的军事冲突已经让位给局部的军事冲突。所以,美国的衰退周期会非常的长。

什么地方会出现军事冲突?不是美国本土,而是东欧,中东,南美,非洲,朝鲜半岛,台海,南海,印度西藏边区。

中美的对抗会以军事冲突为形式吗?不会,因为两个核武器大国是不可能直接有军事冲突的。

中美竞争的核心是:金融和科技。

美国霸权地位什么时候结束?会是一个漫长的过程。会不会有一个时间点?我们不知道。可是只要美元还是全球储备货币的话,美元的霸权地位是很难被动摇的。短期内,最好的公司和资产其实还在美国。全球好的公司都还在美国股市IPO。在金融方面,中国急需发展自己的资本市场。

美国如何维持其美元霸权?最好的办法就是确保美国一直是世界上的大消费市场。即使被中国超越,可是美国本土的消费能力必须保持它的活跃度。如果美国经济不景气,非美元结算的增长速度会更快。

人民币国际化:通过本币结算的贸易和金融的开发,让人民币走出去。发展金融市场有利于降低债务,提高直接融资比例,提高人民币的国际流通性。当更多的好公司以人民币上市,以人民币定价时,中国资本市场的吸引力会不断的提高。可是央行的政策是稳定M2的增速。开发贸易和金融,外部人民币需求增加,内部人民币供给又有限制,这是人民币长期升值的基础。

未来,中国资本市场可期,长期看好沪深300指数和双创50指数,以及恒生科技指数。

美国股市会不会崩盘呢?我认为不会的。全球经济需要美国经济的复苏来带动全球经济走出疫情的阴霾。只要美国经济好起来了,世界经济就会跟着好起来。

疫苗外交:看来发展中国家只能等中国的疫苗了,应该至少要到年底。至于欧洲呢,肯定会再次爆发债务危机。控制好疫情的国家会率先复苏,经济领先。大公司会因为小公司破产而变的更大,龙头效应。

历史的上升期:

我相信历史站在中国的边上,中国领导人也深知这一点。历史站在中国边上是什么意思呢?就是中国会不断的有好消息传出,而且会是意外的好消息。而美国属于历史下行期,会不断有意外的坏消息发生。所以,中国的不确定性好消息是非常的多的,对未来的股市是好事。而美国的不确定坏消息会是非常多的,资本市场波动会越来越激烈。

王毅会见舍曼

体新闻发布点此

重要内容:

王毅:“中方敦促美方尽快取消对华实施的所有单边制裁、高额关税、长臂管辖以及科技封锁。”

这个直接点到了美国的痛处,“关税”。美国不可能近期内解除对中国的一些科技公司的制裁,可是美国是希望通过解除关税来解决美国国内的通膨问题(可以阅读我之前的文章)。在年初的文章,我判断中国有需要跟美国重新谈出新的贸易协议,可是王毅说了 “中国的发展振兴有着巨大内生动力,是历史演变的必然趋势。” 什么意思?意思就是中国没有需要降低对美国关税,经济还是同样可以过的很好。所以,美方认为的关税筹码其实已经落空了。中国不认为关税是一个筹码,也不会让美国利用这个筹码对中国施压。中国的立场非常的清楚:美国要降低关税,因为这个是美方单边的行为,不是中国该承受的对待。当美国先降低关税,中国也会跟着降低相对的关税,因为中国提高关税的对美单边行为的反应。可是,要中国先降税是不可能的事情。所以,美国现在面对的问题是如何让国内群体接受降低关税。因为一旦降低关税,民主党会受到各种批评,说他们是亲中派,对中国不够强硬,会影响到期中选举的一些摇摆地区。

舍曼:“乐见中国实现发展。双方可以开展良性竞争

美国企业是不可能离开中国这个世界最大的单一市场的。可是舍曼说的“良性竞争”到底是什么?是空话还是真意?

舍曼:“美坚持一个中国政策,不支持台湾“独立”

这个是拜登政府一致的态度。可是接下来拜登政府会不会停止炒作台湾问题?最近已经有美国高官访问台湾。舍曼这句话是否真诚?

总结:

这一次美国副国务卿访华就是为了美国高层领导人访问中国铺路,不排除拜登/Blinken直接飞往北京。美国出于国内通膨问题,希望中方配合降低关税,可是中国立场鲜明,降低关税应该是美国自己的事儿,美国应该先行动。有对话是好的,但中美关系回去不了了。

聊一聊碳交易市场

  1. 什么是碳交易市场

简单的来说,碳交易就是排放权的交易。目前全球发展最完善的碳交易市场是欧盟的排放交易体系 (EU ETS)。欧盟委员会制定年度的总碳排放上限,相关的企业会收到一定的碳排放额度。如果企业的排放量比额度低,可以保留多余的额度,或者通过公开市场把排放额度卖出去。如果企业排放量超过了,可以从公开市场购买额度,或被欧盟罚款。罚款金额通常都比较高。为了实现碳中和2060目标,中国也即将开展全国性的碳排放交易市场。值得一提的是目前的ETS并没有覆盖每个行业和企业,而只是针对能源、化工、钢铁等重工业。

除了政府制定的碳排放额度,有些学者也提出了利用森林或自然资源来创造碳排放额度。举个例子,你家里拥有一片森林,可是位置非常偏远,土地价格又低,一直都没有开发,但是这片森林一直在吸收二氧化碳呀。接下来,你可以量化森林所吸纳的碳,然后将它转化为碳排放额度,在交易市场售卖。这样一来,你的森林就可以从公开市场赚取一定的收入,成为一个真正意义上的资产,而不是饭桌上闲聊的话题。那么森林资产风险是什么?如果有一天,森林着火了,或者政府想开发这片森林,那么之前售卖的碳排放额度怎么办?森林着火会释放出非常多的二氧化碳。把森林砍掉了,这些树木叶子腐烂或者烧掉,也会排放二氧化碳。我们怎么去评估和量化森林本身所能够释放的二氧化碳呢?所以啊利用森林创造碳排放额度需要非常完善的法律和监管体系,而放眼全球,非常少的国家在这一方面下功夫。中国是其中一个,所以未来环境资产评估专家会是新的一份职业。

2. 为什么没有一个国际碳交易市场?

我们都知道,债券和股市都是国际化的市场。我今天想买美国的债券,欧洲的股票是没什么问题的。可是碳排放就不一样了。一个碳交易市场要正常的运行,参与者必须同意接受碳排放上限。而碳排放的限制就意味着经济发展的限制。哪个国家会主动交上自己的发展权呢?而且,那些没有资本购买新能源技术的国家,谁来帮助他们产业升级?这些都是无解的问题。所以,虽然理论上碳交易听起来能够解决气候变化问题,可是具体落实的挑战还挺多的。目前来看,本土或者区域化的碳交易比较符合现实情况,而且碳交易也不能够覆盖每一个行业或者公司,不然对产业链会有巨大的冲击。

3. 碳交易市场真的有效吗?

任何一个碳交易市场都是针对所覆盖的地区进行评估的。一个地区排放量的降低,是不是因为碳排放交易起到作用?还是因为碳排放的限制,企业就外流到别的国家或者地区呢?PNAS最近公布的一项研究报告就谈到了这个问题。在评估欧盟区内的碳排放市场效率的时候,并不能够代表全球的碳排放总量也随之下降,毕竟总会有企业转移生产线。最好的样本对象就是那些无法转移生产线的企业,发电行业就是其中之一。而随着ETS的落实和实施,欧盟的发电行业总排放量确实有所降低。因为排放量的限制,加上交易市场机制,这些企业能够及时提高效率,降低污染。

2021年是中国全国性碳交易的元年,针对的行业就是发电行业。随着十四五规划落实,碳交易市场会陆续的覆盖更多的行业,促使产业升级,经济耗能率降低,催化绿色发展改革。

4. 未来国际上的气候变化政策

4月22号,白宫将举行气候变化峰会。虽然拜登和民主党非常重视气候变化以及新能源产业,可是历史告诉我们美国对待气候变化的政策总是反复无常。小布什上台就退出了京都协议,特朗普上台就退出巴黎协议。可见,未来应对气候变化的领导者将会是欧盟和中国,而不是美国。这两个政体都对气候变化有稳定长远的政策。所以接下来的气候变化峰会,欧盟地区国家和中国的表态才是值得我们去关注的,而不是2025连任都不确定的拜登。

如果你对气候变化有兴趣,想多了解能源市场,可以从BP的能源报告开始:

https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/energy-outlook.html